Archive for January, 2007

Gartner on Blogging

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007

There’s been some bold predictions by Gartner on blogging and how the trend might see saturation around next year. (via BBC)

Here are some insightful excerpts.

“Everyone thinks they have something to say, until they’re put on stage and asked to say it.”

The analysts said that during the middle of next year the number of blogs will level out at about 100 million.

The firm has said that 200 million people have already stopped writing their blogs.

“A lot of people have been in and out of this thing,”

I like the first one. A number of people I know have started and then have stopped blogging. Despite wanting to blog, most don’t. Many say they don’t find the time, but I guess that’s one of those simplest excuses you could come up with.
Even if it saturates at 100 million, that’s a lot of blogs. That requires every 1 soul of 70 in the world to blog. A tall order, one can say.

Minglebox - Web 2.0 company in Bangalore

Thursday, January 11th, 2007

Minglebox Communications Private Ltd. is a start up in the internet and mobile space, founded by ex IIT/IIM alumni. The founders are marketing and technology professionals with varied experience in consumer goods, internet, telecom, financial services and IT industries across India and the US. The company aims to build internet and mobile consumer products for the next generation of Indian users. This is located in Bangalore. Minglebox is in the process of setting up a world class technology team to build a set of highly scaleable web 2.0 based applications/platforms. They are looking to getting a couple or more high caliber techies from the Java world with an interest in building web2.0 technology.>>

Are blogs overhyped?

Tuesday, January 9th, 2007
Yes, this is the truth and I just hate it, Blogs are overhyped….recently I came across some Indian guys starting a blog network which will have blogs on 50 different channels…so now the hype starts…people gets excited about the thing “Woha..50 channels…new blog…amazing…will love to read” haah but they don’t know that it is another attempt for SEO and generate some hefty ad revenue…I am saying this after going through the list of blog topics they are going to cover…topics varied a lot… Diabetes, Depression, VOIP, Health, Night Clubs, Gardening, Kitchens etc….. to me it looks like typical example of attempt to generate many pages and generate revenue through ads…(I will love if they can prove me wrong :-) )Many biggies blogged about the much hyped blog (though most of them had commented negative things)

I do not understand why people hype such small things? In the end it is going to burst like bubble and that’s for sure….

I am not naming the site since I do not want to get into name games but if you are in search engine and blogs circuit you will probably know about what I am talking about…

Anyways, let’s see how they come up with…today they are going to launch their site…

Web 3.0 is about creating Semantic Web

Monday, January 8th, 2007

The Semantic Web is a web of data. There is lots of data we all use every day, and its not part of the web. I can see my bank statements on the web, and my photographs, and I can see my appointments in a calendar. But can I see my photos in a calendar to see what I was doing when I took them? Can I see bank statement lines in a calendar?

Why not? Because we don’t have a web of data. Because data is controlled by applications, and each application keeps it to itself.

The Semantic Web is about two things. It is about common formats for interchange of data, where on the original Web we only had interchange of documents. Also it is about language for recording how the data relates to real world objects. That allows a person, or a machine, to start off in one database, and then move through an unending set of databases which are connected not by wires but by being about the same thing more

Internet Marketing in India & SEO

Thursday, January 4th, 2007
India, the traditional hub for business process outsourcing, offshore call centre operations, software development etc. is being knocked off the top spot by countris like Vietnam, Philipppines, South Africa etc.

In a recent study, while India received a smaller share of the vote — under 50 per cent in each category, South African call centers received a score of 51.1 per cent for attributes such as high-quality call handling standards, a strong technological infrastructure and linguistic capabilities. Though the Indian contact centre market has been praised for its graduate labour pool, it has now reached a point of relative maturity with escalating salaries and staff attrition rates.

South Africa has recently emerged as a highly attractive option for UK and European companies that are keen to operate in a similar time-zone, with agents that share a similar cultural outlook. \”Increased competition has seen emerging locations such as South Africa not only able to meet these demands, but offer the advantage of having a similar time zone and culture to the UK.\” There is also the clear advantage of English mother tongue, complemented by a range of European languages. South Africa benefits from lower political risk compared to many of the other popular offshore locations.

Difficulties with accents and cultural differences were some of the shortcomings in India. Also with National Rail Enquiries relocating its contact centre to India, the complexities of foreign agents getting to grip with the geography of Britain have been brought to the fore. The fact that Indian service providers have to invest in costly private networks and that the use of cost-effective Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology is not permitted, may well be reducing the competitive cost advantage the country has traditionally enjoyed as new entrants into the offshore outsourcing market make their mark.

The governments of many Eastern European countries have for some time been working to attract investment in the outsourced contact centre market, using tax breaks and incentives as a carrot for private enterprise. Despite this, and the obvious advantage of proximity to Western Europe and relative economic stability, our research indicates that Eastern European and former USSR nations are not yet perceived to have attained a sufficiently high standard of call handling necessary to rival their more far-flung - and cost-effective - competitors. The wide range of languages spoken and the affinity with Western European culture may partially bridge this cost difference in the immediate, but EU enlargement will almost certainly push prices up in the long-term.

Vis-a-via Philipppines, which is giving tough competition to India, labour costs in the Philippines tend to be higher than in India but high unemployment and a large pool of graduate level labour have been instrumental in suppressing attrition rates. Latterly, however, there have been reports that the nation is adopting a sweatshop ethic, which is inevitably beginning to trickle down to the standards of its call handling, with a knock-on effect on general perceptions.

Justin’s Rules For Success

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007
I’m going through an interesting change in my life. A change that will bring more focus to my family, and business… Hope this helps…

#1: Be Narrow
Focus on the smallest possible problem you could solve that would potentially be useful. Most companies start out trying to do too many things, which makes life difficult and turns you into a me-too. Focusing on a small niche has so many advantages: With much less work, you can be the best at what you do. Small things, like a microscopic world, almost always turn out to be bigger than you think when you zoom in. You can much more easily position and market yourself when more focused. And when it comes to partnering, or being acquired, there’s less chance for conflict. This is all so logical and, yet, there’s a resistance to focusing. I think it comes from a fear of being trivial. Just remember: If you get to be #1 in your category, but your category is too small, then you can broaden your scope-and you can do so with leverage.

#2: Be Different
Ideas are in the air. There are lots of people thinking about-and probably working on-the same thing you are. And one of them is Google. Deal with it.
How? First of all, realize that no sufficiently interesting space will be limited to one player. In a sense, competition actually is good-especially to legitimize new markets. Second, see #1-the specialist will almost always kick the generalist’s ass. Third, consider doing something that’s not so cutting edge. Many highly successful companies-the aforementioned big G being one-have thrived by taking on areas that everyone thought were done and redoing them right. Also? Get a good, non-generic name. Easier said than done, granted. But the most common mistake in naming is trying to be too descriptive, which leads to lots of hard-to-distinguish names. How many blogging companies have “blog” in their name, RSS companies “feed,” or podcasting companies “pod” or “cast”? Rarely are they the ones that stand out.

#3: Be Casual
We’re moving into what I call the era of the “Casual Web” (and casual content creation). This is much bigger than the hobbyist web or the professional web. Why? Because people have lives. And now, people with lives also have broadband. If you want to hit the really big home runs, create services that fit in with-and, indeed, help-people’s everyday lives without requiring lots of commitment or identity change. Flickr enables personal publishing among millions of folks who would never consider themselves personal publishers-they’re just sharing pictures with friends and family, a casual activity. Casual games are huge. Skype enables casual conversations.

#4: Be Picky
Another perennial business rule, and it applies to everything you do:
features, employees, investors, partners, press opportunities. Startups are often too eager to accept people or ideas into their world. You can almost always afford to wait if something doesn’t feel just right, and false negatives are usually better than false positives. One of Google’s biggest strengths-and sources of frustration for outsiders-was their willingness to say no to opportunities, easy money, potential employees, and deals.

#5: Be User-Centric
User experience is everything. It always has been, but it’s still undervalued and under-invested in. If you don’t know user-centered design, study it. Hire people who know it. Obsess over it. Live and breathe it. Get your whole company on board. Better to iterate a hundred times to get the right feature right than to add a hundred more. The point of Ajax is that it can make a site more responsive, not that it’s sexy. Tags can make things easier to find and classify, but maybe not in your application. The point of an API is so developers can add value for users, not to impress the geeks.
Don’t get sidetracked by technologies or the blog-worthiness of your next feature. Always focus on the user and all will be well.

#6: Be Self-Centered
Great products almost always come from someone scratching their own itch.
Create something you want to exist in the world. Be a user of your own product. Hire people who are users of your product. Make it better based on your own desires. (But don’t trick yourself into thinking you are your user, when it comes to usability.) Another aspect of this is to not get seduced into doing deals with big companies at the expense or your users or at the expense of making your product better. When you’re small and they’re big, it’s hard to say no, but see #4.

#7: Be Greedy
It’s always good to have options. One of the best ways to do that is to have income. While it’s true that traffic is now again actually worth something, the give-everything-away-and-make-it-up-on-volume strategy stamps an expiration date on your company’s ass. In other words, design something to charge for into your product and start taking money within 6 months (and do it with PayPal). Done right, charging money can actually accelerate growth, not impede it, because then you have something to fuel marketing costs with.
More importantly, having money coming in the door puts you in a much more powerful position when it comes to your next round of funding or acquisition talks. In fact, consider whether you need to have a free version at all. The TypePad approach-taking the high-end position in the market-makes for a great business model in the right market. Less support. Less scalability concerns. Less abuse. And much higher margins.

#8: Be Tiny
It’s standard web startup wisdom by now that with the substantially lower costs to starting something on the web, the difficulty of IPOs, and the willingness of the big guys to shell out for small teams doing innovative stuff, the most likely end game if you’re successful is acquisition.
Acquisitions are much easier if they’re small. And small acquisitions are possible if valuations are kept low from the get go. And keeping valuations low is possible because it doesn’t cost much to start something anymore (especially if you keep the scope narrow). Besides the obvious techniques, one way to do this is to use turnkey services to lower your overhead-Administaff, ServerBeach, web apps, maybe even Elance.

#9: Be Agile
You know that old saw about a plane flying from California to Hawaii being off course 99% of the time-but constantly correcting? The same is true of successful startups-except they may start out heading toward Alaska. Many dot-com bubble companies that died could have eventually been successful had they been able to adjust and change their plans instead of running as fast as they could until they burned out, based on their initial assumptions.
Pyra was started to build a project-management app, not Blogger. Flickr’s company was building a game. Ebay was going to sell auction software.
Initial assumptions are almost always wrong. That’s why the waterfall approach to building software is obsolete in favor agile techniques. The same philosophy should be applied to building a company.

#10: Be Balanced
What is a startup without bleary-eyed, junk-food-fueled, balls-to-the-wall days and sleepless, caffeine-fueled, relationship-stressing nights? Answer?:
A lot more enjoyable place to work. Yes, high levels of commitment are crucial. And yes, crunch times come and sometimes require an inordinate, painful, apologies-to-the-SO amount of work. But it can’t be all the time.
Nature requires balance for health-as do the bodies and minds who work for you and, without which, your company will be worthless. There is no better way to maintain balance and lower your stress that I’ve found than David Allen’s GTD process. Learn it. Live it. Make it a part of your company, and you’ll have a secret weapon.

#11 (bonus!): Be Wary
Overgeneralized lists of business “rules” are not to be taken too literally.
There are exceptions to everything.